About StetPro
Students increasingly rely on technology to get their ideas into written form. Educators increasingly need confidence that the work submitted to them is still the student’s own. StetPro was built to support both of those needs at the same time.
We do not treat accessibility and academic integrity as opposing interests. A student who needs help expressing their work and an educator who needs to understand how it was produced are, in practice, asking for the same thing: a clear account of how the writing came about.
Why StetPro exists
Dictation has been available for a long time, and for many students it is a practical way of getting words onto the page. What has changed is everything sitting next to it. Writing tools can now draft, restructure and rephrase to a standard that makes the line between assistance and authorship difficult to see in a finished document.
That creates an awkward position for both sides. A student using legitimate assistance can end up with nothing to show that the ideas and the words were theirs. An educator, looking only at the finished document, is left trying to infer authorship from how the writing reads.
StetPro was designed around keeping that distinction visible. Speech should be a practical route into written work, and using it should not cost the student the evidence of their own authorship.
A different starting point
Most approaches to this problem begin with the finished essay and work backwards, trying to determine retrospectively how it was produced. StetPro starts at the other end, with the process itself.
The student speaks
They say the work in their own words.
A raw transcript is captured
Kept as it was spoken, and not edited afterwards.
Formatting is applied
Presentation only, with the wording preserved.
The finished work
Exported onwards, with the earlier record still attached.
What is retained, and who can see it, depends on how the account or institution has been configured. This is not a claim that authorship can be proved absolutely. It is a record made while the work was being created, rather than an estimate produced afterwards.
Accessibility and integrity together
Assistive technology should not place a student in the position of having to defend whether their work is really theirs. That is the principle the product is built on.
Speaking can be a useful route into writing for a wide range of people, including those who:
- find typing slow or tiring
- find spelling difficult
- find handwriting difficult
- find sustained keyboard use physically difficult
- find it hard to get started with a blank page
- think more clearly out loud than on the page
StetPro is not restricted to any particular group of students, and it does not ask anyone to declare a reason for using it. The point is simply this: making work easier to express should not make its authorship harder to demonstrate.
Our approach to AI
Our view is that this kind of technology should have a defined job and defined boundaries. In StetPro, that job is presentation. When a formatted copy is produced from a raw transcript, the changes permitted are the ones that make speech readable on the page.
What formatting may do
- Add punctuation
- Apply capitalisation
- Break the text into paragraphs
- Remove the false starts and repetitions of ordinary speech
What it is not there to do
- Rewrite or paraphrase
- Improve or reorder the argument
- Substitute more academic vocabulary
- Generate material the student did not say
- Correct the student’s ideas
The purpose is to help present what the student actually said. Because the raw transcript is kept separately, the formatted version can always be read against it.
Built around evidence
Evidence is more useful when it already exists than when it has to be reconstructed after a question has been raised. Depending on permissions and configuration, the record around a piece of work can include the original audio, the raw transcript, the formatted version and the associated audit information.
Access to that record is granted rather than assumed. Educators are given access to the students they support, and only to finalised work; audio is a separate permission again, so transcripts can be reviewable while audio remains unavailable. The Evidence & Integrity page sets out what is kept and who can see it in full.
Designed for real educational use
StetPro is meant to sit alongside the way people already work, not to replace it.
- Students keep usable exports of their work — Word (.docx), PDF, plain text, or copied to the clipboard — and carry on writing wherever they normally would.
- Educators can be given appropriately controlled access to the students they support, rather than to everything held in an organisation.
- Audio access is permissioned separately from transcript access.
- The system preserves a record of how work was produced; it does not try to become the student’s writing environment.
Who is behind StetPro
StetPro is a UK product built for use in education. It is registered with the Information Commissioner’s Office under registration number ZA037968, and enquiries are handled at enquiries@stetpro.net.
[Company story/details to be supplied]
Trusted. Certified. Compliant.
StetPro is built to meet the security, governance and quality standards expected by UK higher education and the public sector.
- Crown Commercial Service (CCS) Supplier
- G-Cloud Supplier
- ICO Registered – Registration No. ZA037968
- ISO 9001:2015 Certified – Quality Management System
- ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Certified – Information Security Management System
Two things that belong together
A student should be able to use technology that helps them express their own work. An educator should be able to understand how that work was created. StetPro exists to make those two things possible at once.